LETTER
federal agency on construction and housing and communal services reports on the issues raised.
In accordance with clause 4.7 of the Methodology for determining the cost of construction products on the territory Russian Federation- MDS 81-35.2004, work performed during the repair and reconstruction of buildings and structures, similar to processes in new construction, should be normalized according to the relevant collections for construction and special construction works(except for the norms of the collection with the application of coefficients of 1.15 to feed labor costs and 1.25 to the norms of the operating time of construction machines).
Since finishing and plumbing works are related to construction and special work, the introduction of the above procedure applies to these works, as well as to drainage works, the cost rates of which are given in the Collection N 1 of GESN-2001 "Earthworks".
With regard to whether the mentioned coefficients apply to the installation and dismantling of scaffolding, attention should be paid to which scaffolding will be used. If it is planned to use inventory scaffolding, the costs of installation and dismantling of which are given in the Collection N 8 of GESN-2001 "Constructions from bricks and blocks", then the use of the above coefficients is justified.
If it is planned to use non-inventory scaffolding, the cost rates for installation and dismantling of which are given in the Collections of GESNr-2001 for repair and construction work, these coefficients should not be applied.
2. There is a double interpretation in these documents due to the fact that such a double interpretation takes place in the third document, which came out before the publication of the said documents. In clause 3.3.1 of the Guidelines for the development of collections (catalogues) of estimated prices for materials, products, structures and collections of estimated prices for the transportation of goods for the construction and overhaul of buildings and structures MDS 81-2.99 in the list of components of the estimated price for materials, including others, loading and unloading operations are also given with a clause in brackets, as a rule, the cost of loading operations is taken into account directly by the selling price, and the cost of unloading operations is included in the unit prices for construction and installation and repair and construction works, and then the bracket is closed.
What is stated in parentheses is true in essence, since the resource consumption rates given in the GESN and GESNr take into account the costs of unloading materials and structures at the on-site warehouse, which was not practiced either in the 1984 or 1991 base, and the costs of intra-construction transportation of materials and structures.
However, Appendix 10 of the same MDS 81-2.99 provides a typical example of the calculation of transportation costs, in which the list of costs includes unloading and intra-construction transportation of materials.
Considering that on the basis of GESN and GESNr, the Federal Unit Rates (FBR) and Territorial Unit Rates (TER) have been developed, in which the costs of unloading materials and structures at the on-site warehouse and the costs of intra-construction transportation of materials and structures are also taken into account, the costs of unloading materials at on-site warehouse and for loading and unloading in vehicles for intra-construction transportation, it should be taken into account as part of the item for wages in direct costs.
COMMENTS
to the Methodology for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian IBC Federation 81-35.2004
The specified Methodology came out instead of a number of documents previously issued by the Gosstroy of Russia. First of all, this concerns the Guidelines for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian Federation MDS 81-1.99, which were a similar document preceding the new one.
The New Methodology is not just a rewrite in new document old postulates from previous similar documents with a slight addition of some materials, mainly taking into account changes in the current legislation. In the new Methodology, a number of postulates are illuminated in a new way.
First of all, you should pay attention to the following question. In all previous estimate-normative and methodological documents, starting with the estimate-normative base of 1969 (the estimate-normative base of 1955 is vaguely remembered). There are phrases "elemental estimated norms do not apply to unique buildings and structures ...". At the same time, not a single regulatory or methodological document clearly gave a clear concept of what “unique buildings”, “unique structures” are. There were a lot of questions, disputes and disagreements, but I don’t remember that for some object, even for a truly unique one, individual estimated norms and unit prices would be compiled due to the uniqueness of the building and, as a result, the uniqueness of the work. In the absence of certain state elemental estimated norms and unit prices, individual elemental norms and unit prices, calculations were compiled more than once, what was, was. And now they are being compiled. But that's not it. Not about that in question. But just because of the uniqueness, to calculate something, to draw up individual estimated norms and prices - I don’t remember something. Although contractors from time to time made such demands (including me) tried to demand from time to time the determination of the cost of certain works or structures according to individual calculations, referring to the uniqueness of the building, but the designers fought back quite easily. What is unique about this wall? What is unique about this column? they asked. And so, dividing the questions and translating them into the plane of individual constructs and types of work (and the norms are just being developed for individual constructs and types of work), thereby simplifying the very formulation of the question, they, the designers, quite easily fought off all the claims of contractors. Especially since the customers supported them. Indeed, what is unique in this wall, what is unique about this column?
In the new methodology, the topic is presented in a different way. In the second sentence of clause 2.7 of the Methodology, it is said as follows: “GESN does not apply to individual designs and types of work, for the capitality, accuracy class and quality of which there are increased requirements ...”. This is already something else. What is an accuracy class? These are the permissible deviations from the design dimensions given in the regulatory documents - SNiP for the production of work. And this is a document. For example, in SNiP 3.03.01-87 "Bearing and enclosing structures", clause 7.90 and table. 34 states that the maximum deviations of the thickness of brick wall structures are ± 15 mm, and the maximum deviations of the displacement of the axes of brick wall structures from the center axes are 10 mm. But, if, due to certain motives, a different size of deviations is indicated in the working drawings, more stringent, i.e., smaller than given above, then the contractor has the right to demand individual elemental norms and prices for these works - norms of labor costs and work time construction machines and mechanisms are designed after all for standard conditions, i.e. conditions for compliance with the tolerances given in SNiP 3.03.01-87. And when the conditions are more stringent, then more time will be required to work. So it is necessary to develop individual elemental estimated norms. In the same SNiP, similar tolerances are given for concrete and reinforced concrete structures, and for metal structures, the principle of the approach is always the same - in the case of more stringent, in comparison with the tolerances given in this SNiP, design requirements, it is necessary to develop individual elemental estimated norms and prices. More about this is written in the three-volume book “Estimates for construction and repair work on a new regulatory framework».
By the way, if there are no more stringent requirements in the project, it is not difficult to admit a situation where the brick outer and inner walls are shifted from each other by 10 mm each, therefore, the distance between them will increase by 20 mm. And, in addition, each of the walls will have a thickness deviation of minus 15 mm. Everything will be within tolerances, and the distance between the walls will increase by 50 mm. With other signs of deviations, the distance between the walls will decrease by the same 50 mm. In both cases, if it is necessary to clad transverse walls with granite or marble or install floors from granite or marble slabs, a stone-cutting machine is indispensable, local adjustment is required. Consequently, the norms and prices for both stone wall cladding and stone flooring should provide for the use of stone-cutting machines and the time for sawing slabs, taking into account their adjustment. It turns out that in the above cases it is useful to know the tolerances given in SNiP 3.03.01-87 "Bearing and enclosing structures". But this is from another area.
In the second sentence above, clause 2.7 of the Methodology continues further: “... as well as for types of work in mountainous areas performed at an altitude of more than 3500 meters above sea level.” Nothing of the kind has been cited in any of the regulatory documents before, this is the first time. But building in the mountains, at high altitude, in the region of glaciers and mountain passes is probably much more difficult than in normal conditions and on the plain, isn't it? Therefore, the norms - prices should also differ.
In Appendix 1 to the Methodology, in the tables of coefficients for labor costs, wages of workers, norms of time and costs for the operation of machines, multiplying coefficients are given for the construction and repair of facilities in mountainous areas, separately at an altitude of 1500 to 2500 m, from 2500 to 3000 m, from 3000 to 3500 m, but this will be discussed below when we consider these tables.
Further, clause 2.7 of the Methodology ends with the following sentence: "For such types of work, individual elemental estimated norms or correction factors are developed that take into account the relevant features of the work." Therefore, it is possible to develop individual norms and prices, or correction (increasing) factors. And this is already easier, since individual norms and prices will have to be developed for each type of work, and correction (increasing) factors can be developed for the main, most common types of work by determining the size of the coefficients in the following way- individual estimated norms and prices for these main types of work are developed, compared with the state elemental estimated norms and unit prices for the same types of work, based on the comparison, correction (increasing) coefficients are derived, after which these coefficients apply to the remaining types of work that are not related to to the main ones. This method is much simpler, in its own way it allows you to get rid of the calculation of a large (often prevailing) number of all kinds of small auxiliary works, the total estimated cost of which is often much lower than the cost of the main works (hence, the calculation errors possible with this method will not have a significant impact on reliable determinations estimated cost). And then the need for calculation a large number work will scare away the estimators involved in this work, with its laboriousness.
The foregoing applies both to cases of construction in mountainous areas, and to cases of erection of structures and performance of work, for the solidity, accuracy class and quality of which there are increased requirements.
Attention should be paid to the text of the third paragraph of clause 2.2. Methods: “Given that estimates are being developed based principle of averaging with minimization of consumption all necessary resources, it should be taken into account that standards to the side their reductions are not corrected". This is very important point. It must be said that in our country, resource consumption rates have always been calculated at a minimum, but it is one thing when before everything was state-owned, everything was built at the expense of the state, including and sought to save everywhere and on everything. And it is a completely different matter when today many objects are being built at the expense of interests that have the right to know what they will receive for their money. If, for example, the consumption rate of linoleum when installing linoleum floors is 102.0 m2 per 100 m2 of floor, that is, only 2% is allocated for losses and waste, it is easy to imagine that all linoleum trimmings will lie on the floor in our apartments. Which is what happens in reality. The same is true with roll roofs, where standard flow roll materials, taking into account losses, waste, overlaps, suggests that all scraps of roll materials will be put into the case. And the more scraps fit into the roof, the more joints. And leaks, as you know, occur precisely at the joints. But investors may not agree with such savings in resources at the expense of quality. They are ready to accept a higher (within reasonable limits) cost of linoleum floors and rolled roofs, as long as trimming is not used. But some officials of customers are trying to correct these standards downwards, just to prove their usefulness. And here it is important to imagine the consequences of such decisions.
This phrase was previously absent in the text of methodological and regulatory documents, and its appearance in this Methodology is the first such precedent - less is impossible, but more is possible. Previously, it was always considered the opposite.
It should be noted that the text does not talk about estimated norms, but about estimated standards. So the question is broader. Indeed, in addition to the elemental estimated norms, there are other estimated standards, it is also unacceptable to correct them downwards. And then some zealous customers are trying to reduce or even eliminate procurement and storage costs from the composition of the estimated prices, the standard which is in the amount 2% has existed for centuries and continues to have the right to exist, in an average amount. For more information about this, see the magazine "Estimate Review" N 2 p. 77 in the heading "Consultations and clarifications".
In the technical parts of some GESN collections, it is said that the consumption of materials given in the tables of the GESN collections can be taken as write-off rates. This, for example, is stated in paragraph 1.5 of the main provisions on the use of GESNr-2001 for repair and construction work “The data obtained on the basis of GESNr on the composition of the amount of resources can be used to determine the duration of work, compiling various technological documentation and writing off materials.” But after all, what has been stated in terms of writing off materials is fundamentally wrong. In the elemental estimated norms, the consumption of resources, including materials and products, is determined on the basis of the principle of averaging, and this is correct. And when writing off, one should have norms not averaged, but for a specific type of work, that is, production (and not estimated) norms for the consumption of materials. In the book "Estimates for construction work"An example was given when, when concreting columns with a section of 30x30 cm, 40x40 cm, 50x50 cm, the estimated consumption rate of formwork panels (or lumber, i.e. boards), taking into account the turnover, is given one for everything about everything , and when calculating for 1 m3 of concrete, the consumption of formwork panels for columns with a section of 30x30 cm per 1 m3 of concrete will be the largest, and for columns with a section of 50x50 cm - the smallest. So in such cases for writing off materials, the principle of averaging is not suitable and there must be production standards, with gradation- separately for columns with a section of 30x30 cm, 40x40 cm and 50x50 cm. The situation is similar with painting or glazing windows. Windows can be with or without vents, double-leaf, three-leaf or single-leaf, narrower or wider, with or without sash bars, and the estimated consumption rates of materials both for painting windows and for glazing them are the same, averaged. But production rates for paint or glass should be specified by type of window. And it is no coincidence that in the last paragraph of clause 2.5. The methodology says: “Resource indicators obtained on the basis of GESN (meaning all elemental estimated norms - both GESN as such, and GESNr and GESNm) can serve as the basis for production rates for the consumption of materials and their write-off.” It's all right, that's right. The basis for the development of production consumption rates and write-offs of materials can be the norms of GESN, but they cannot be the basis directly for the write-off of materials for the reasons stated above.
Attention should be paid to one inconsistency or even a contradiction that took place in the estimated regulatory base of GESN-2001. This is the application of coefficients of 1.15 to labor costs and 1.25 to the operating time of construction machines when repairing and reconstructing buildings and structures, works similar to technological processes in new construction (including the cost of erecting new elements). In the last paragraph of paragraph 1.28 of the Collection N46 GESN-2001 “Works during the reconstruction of buildings and structures” it is said: “In this case, the coefficients differentiated according to the conditions of work, given in the “General Guidelines for the Use of GESN”, do not apply. And in the second paragraph of clause 1.13 of the main provisions on the application of GESN-2001, there is no such condition. With the release of the Methodology, this discrepancy was eliminated, since in the second paragraph clause 4.7. Methods says: Performed during the repair and reconstruction of buildings and structures, work similar to technological processes in new construction should be normalized according to the relevant collections of GESN-2001 for construction and special construction work (except for the norms of the collection of GESN N46 "Works during the reconstruction of buildings and structures") using coefficients of 1.15 to the labor cost standards and 1.25 to the norms of the operating time of construction machines. The indicated coefficients may be used in conjunction with the coefficients given in Appendix N1 to this Methodology.
So we quietly approached the issues of applying increasing coefficients that take into account complicating factors in the production of work (people often call them “coefficients for constraint”, but there are other coefficients there). Such tables were in the estimated regulatory base of 1969, 1984, 1991. They are also given in the Methodology, in Appendix N1 to it and are given much more widely.
First, before there have always been coefficients that take into account the cramped conditions for the production of work in existing buildings and structures in the presence of harmful working conditions for workers in the main production (and hence for builders too) - with or without a transfer to a reduced working day, at 36, 30 and 24 hour work weeks. But the coefficients that take into account these most harmful working conditions, but without constraint, have not been previously given. But after all, harmful working conditions in themselves are complicating factors in the production of work, especially with a shortened working day and a shortened working week. Now such coefficients are provided.
Secondly, in the Guidelines for the use of GESN-2001 for construction and special construction work - MDS 81-28.2001, in the Guidelines for the use of GESNm-2001 for the installation of equipment - MDS 81-29.2001, as well as in the general instructions for the use of GESNr-2001 are given multiplying coefficients that take into account the production of an operating high voltage overhead power transmission line (TL) in the security zone. But why only near power lines? Is the work inside the existing TP and RP less dangerous? Or work in production shops near existing electrical equipment. In the Methodology, this item is set out as follows: "Production of construction and other works near high-voltage facilities, including in the security zone of an existing overhead power line." Moreover, in the first paragraph of paragraph 1 of the Notes to the table of coefficients that take into account complicating factors, it says “Work near live objects includes work inside existing buildings, the internal wiring of which is not de-energized”.
Many people know how difficult it is to work in the mountains. Both shortness of breath and strength run out much earlier, and you want to take a break more often. Yes, and equipment with an internal combustion engine at a height, in conditions of rarefied air, works less productively. But the coefficients to the norms of labor costs from the time of operation of construction machines and mechanisms when working in mountainous conditions were not previously provided. Now they are.
Notes to the mentioned tables have been significantly supplemented. About work inside buildings with non-de-energized wiring has already been mentioned. In addition, earlier in applications to similar tables, speaking of cramped conditions, 4 factors were listed, and in the new Methodology, 2 more were added to the above four: during the construction of facilities, when the building density exceeds the norm by 20% or more; during the construction of facilities, when, in accordance with the requirements of safety regulations, the construction organization project provides for limiting the rotation of the tower crane boom.
The notes also stipulate that harmful production conditions also include work in existing health care enterprises (tuberculosis dispensaries, leper colonies, etc.), where, in accordance with current legislation, employees of the main production have a reduced working day.
Both in the previously existing cost estimates and in the new Methodology, the coefficients that take into account cramped conditions in the presence of harmful working conditions in open and semi-open areas are set somewhat smaller than in working conditions inside buildings and structures. It is understandable when harmful working conditions mean the presence of steam, dust, harmful gases, smoke, etc. - ventilation is higher in semi-open and open areas and, therefore, the impact of these harmful working conditions is reduced. However, under such harmful working conditions as the presence of lead, zinc, mercury or heavy metal dust or radiation, the effect of such harmful working conditions cannot be reduced by airing, therefore this question specified separately in the application.
It should be noted that Appendix No. 1 to the Methodology contains 4 tables of complicating factors:
In the course of construction work;
In the production of repair and construction works;
In the production of commissioning, which correspond with each other and at the same time have their own characteristics. So, for example, in the table of complicating factors in the production of repair and construction works, multiplying factors are given that take into account the repair of existing buildings (including residential buildings) without resettlement, as well as the repair of individual structural elements of buildings located in the built-up city center:
Facade repair;
Repair of complex roofs;
Repair of the yard and adjacent to buildings improvement. To be continued.
PhD in Economics
DEVELOPED by the Department of Pricing and estimated rationing Gosstroy of Russia (head - V.A. Stepanov, responsible executor - E.E. Ermolaev, I.Yu. Nosenko), with the participation of the Baltic Construction Company (V.M. Simanovich), the Central Research Institute of Economics and Management in Construction (V.I. Koretsky, V.M. Didkovsky, Zh.G. Chernyshova), Scientific and Technical Center "Stroyinvestnauka" of the Moscow State Civil Engineering University (N.M. Shumeiko, V.P. Berezin, S.B. Sborshchikov), GASIS (I.T. Tsirunyan), Transstroy Corporation (S.S. Abdrakhmanov, Kh.Z. Bashirova), CJSC INiK (Yu.V. Zhabenko, V.M. Beznos), Operations Committee housing stock administration of St. Petersburg (N.M. Letenko).
APPROVED by the Scientific and Technical Council of the Gosstroy of Russia.
INTRODUCED FOR APPROVAL by the Department of Pricing and Estimated Rationing of the Gosstroy of Russia.
ADOPTED AND PUT INTO EFFECT on March 9, 2004 by the Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia dated 05.03.2004 No. 15/1.
REVIEWED by the Ministry of Justice of Russia and recognized as a document that complies with the legislation of the Russian Federation and does not need state registration(Letter No. 07/2699-YUD dated March 10, 2004).
INSTEAD OF "Code of rules for determining the cost of construction as part of pre-project and design and estimate documentation" SP 81-01-94, introduced by letter of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated December 29, 1994 No. VB-12-276, "Guidelines for determining the cost of construction products in the territory of the Russian Federation" MDS 81-1.99, put into effect by the Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia dated 04.26.99 No. 31, "Instructions for the use of GESN-2001 for construction and special construction work" MDS 81-28.2001, "Instructions for the application. GESNm-2001 for the installation of equipment » MDS 81-29.2001, "Guidelines for the use of GESNp-2001 for commissioning" MDS 81-27.2001, General instructions on the use of GESNr-2001 for repair and construction work, as well as "Temporary guidelines for determining the cost of work in the construction and repair of roads" MDS 81-30.2002.
In accordance with the order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated November 27, 2003 No. VYa-P10-14161, the provisions given in the Methodology apply to all enterprises building complex of the Russian Federation when determining the cost of building new, reconstructing, expanding and technically re-equipping existing enterprises, buildings and structures, performing repair and commissioning work, regardless of sources of financing carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as when setting prices for construction products and paying for completed work.
FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION AGENCY
AND HOUSING AND UTILITIES
Letter dated February 14, 2006 No. sk-481/02 on the withdrawal from printing of instructions on the application of federal unit prices for commissioning
The Federal Agency for Construction, Housing and Communal Services announces the publication of the Guidelines for the Application of Federal Unit Rates for commissioning works(MDS 81-40.2006), approved by the Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia dated 01.09.2003 No. 160.
With the release of this document, the coefficients for the conditions of work should be taken according to tables 2 and 3 of the Guidelines for the use of federal unit prices for commissioning instead of the recommended coefficients given in table 4 of Appendix No. 1 to the Methodology for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian Federation (MDS 81-35.2004).
METHODOLOGY
DETERMINATION OF THE COST OF BUILDING PRODUCTS IN THE TERRITORY
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
MDS 81-35.2004
In accordance with the order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated November 27, 2003 N VYa-P10-14161, the provisions given in the Methodology apply to all enterprises of the construction complex of the Russian Federation when determining the cost of building new, reconstruction, expansion and technical re-equipment of existing enterprises, buildings and structures, performance of repair and commissioning works, regardless of the sources of financing carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as in the formation of prices for construction products and payments for work performed.
DEVELOPED by the Department of Pricing and Estimated Rationing of the Gosstroy of Russia (head - V.A. Stepanov, responsible executor - E.E. Ermolaev, I.Yu. Nosenko), with the participation of the Baltic construction company(V.M. Simanovich), Central Research Institute of Economics and Management in Construction (V.I. Koretsky, V.M. Didkovsky, Zh.G. Chernyshova), Scientific and Technical Center "Stroyinvestnauka" of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering ( N.M. Shumeiko, V.P. Berezin, S.B. Sborshchikov), GASIS (I.T. Tsirunyan), Transstroy Corporation (S.S. Abdrakhmanov, Kh.Z. Bashirova), CJSC "INiK" (Yu.V. Zhabenko, V.M. Beznos), the Committee for the Maintenance of the Housing Fund of the Administration of St. Petersburg (N.M. Letenko).
APPROVED by the Scientific and Technical Council of the Gosstroy of Russia.
INTRODUCED FOR APPROVAL by the Department of Pricing and Estimated Rationing of the Gosstroy of Russia.
ADOPTED AND PUT INTO EFFECT on March 9, 2004 by the Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia dated 05.03.2004 N 15/1.
REVIEWED by the Ministry of Justice of Russia and recognized as a document that complies with the legislation of the Russian Federation and does not need state registration (letter dated 10.03.2004 N 07 / 2699-YUD).
INSTEAD OF "Code of rules for determining the cost of construction as part of the pre-project and design and estimate documentation"SP 81-01-94, introduced by the letter of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated 12.29.94 N VB-12-276, "Guidelines for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian Federation" MDS 81-1.99, put into effect by a resolution of the State Construction Committee of Russia dated 26.04. 99 N 31, "Guidelines for the use of GESN-2001 for construction and special construction work" MDS 81-28.2001, "Guidelines for the use of GESNm-2001 for the installation of equipment" MDS 81-29.2001, "Guidelines for the use of GESNp-2001 for commissioning" MDS 81-27.2001, General guidelines for the use of GESNr-2001 for repair and construction work, as well as "Temporary guidelines to determine the cost of work during construction and repair highways"MDS 81-30.2002.
-
Determining the cost of equipment installation
Question: Clarifications on the correctness of the application of prices:
- for the dismantling of cold and hot air ducts (Appendix No. 1, 2), the design institute applied the price FERm0b-02-014-16 (Air duct with fittings, compensators, valves, supports and suspensions, supplied in blocks, shields and rolls of boilers with steam capacity: 220 -1000 t/h, on pulverized coal fuel) with coefficient for dismantling = 0.5. The customer issues a comment on the replacement of this price for FERm06-02-014-3 (Dust pipeline with fittings, compensators, valves, supports and hangers and individual parts of boilers with steam capacity: 1000-1650 t/h);
- for the dismantling of the cooling route for the supporting structures of the casing of the superheater chambers, the price FERm06-02-014-16 was applied with a coefficient. for dismantling = 0.5. The customer proposes to replace it with FERm06-05-001-16 (Heater, cooler, supplied assembled: horizontal, weight 31 tons);
- for the dismantling of the suction of gases from the slag mine (Appendix 3), the price of FERm06-02-014-16 was applied, with a coefficient. for dismantling = 0.5. The customer proposes to replace it with FERm06-02-014-10 (Gas pipeline with fittings, compensators, valves, supports and hangers, supplied in blocks, shields and coils of boilers with steam output: 1000-1650 t/h, on pulverized coal fuel).When developing estimate documentation for the performance of the relevant types of work, the choice of one or another price from the current estimated standards is carried out in accordance with the work production technology used in the project and falls within the competence of the organization carrying out the development project documentation, and the construction customer. At the same time, the choice of norms and prices for applicable use in the estimate documentation (in the absence of direct estimate prices) is recommended to be carried out taking into account the maximum compliance of the scope of work and resources of the applicable standard with the conditions for the production of work provided for by the project. Payments for the work performed are carried out in the manner prescribed by the state (municipal) contract, within the limits of a fixed contract price in accordance with part 13 of article 34 federal law dated 05.04.2013 No. 44-FZ “On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services to meet state and municipal needs” and article 746 Civil Code Russian Federation. Disagreements arising at the stage of implementation of the state (municipal) contract are resolved in provided by law Russian Federation is fine.
-
Question: Is it legal to apply the coefficients 1.15 and 1.25 MDS 81-35.2004 p.4.7. When repairing and reconstructing buildings and structures, work similar to technological processes in new construction OZP = 1.15; EM=1.25; ZPM=1.25; TK=1.15; TZM = 1.25 for the FER 44 collection “Underwater construction (diving) work”.During reconstruction and overhaul objects, the possibility of using generally accepted technological schemes for the production of works is excluded, the costs of manual labor in intra-construction transport and the delivery of materials to the working area increase.
The need for application in local estimates coefficients that take into account the complicating conditions for the production of individual complexes of construction, installation and repair and construction works, is established in the project for the organization of construction (overhaul), developed in accordance with the Regulations on the composition of sections of project documentation and the requirements for their content, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of February 16 .2008 No. 87.
According to clause 4.7 of MDS 81-35.2004, when rationing work performed under conditions of reconstruction and overhaul, according to the relevant collections of GESN-2001 for construction and special construction works (except for the collection of GESN No. 46), coefficients of 1.15 are applied to labor cost standards and 1, 25 to the norms of the operating time of construction machines.
The specified coefficients do not apply to installation and commissioning, as well as work on the dismantling of structures and dismantling of existing structures.
The reason for not applying the coefficients 1.15 to the norms of labor costs and 1.25 to the norms of the operating time of construction machines may be an indication of the identity of the technology of the repair work being performed, the technology of performing work in new construction in terms of reference(technical requirements) in the section "Special conditions for the production of works".
-
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: The cost of construction of an object located on the territory of the Krasnodar Territory is determined in accordance with the methodology provided for by MDS 81-35.2004 using the base-index method according to the TER-2001 regulatory framework as amended in 2014. The object is located in a mountainous area at an altitude of 1700 m, and therefore, in local estimates, a correction factor is used from Appendix No. 1, paragraph 9 “Construction of objects in a mountainous area at an altitude of 1500 to 2500 m above sea level”. On the territory of the object there are various parts of the terrain, including slopes with an inclination angle of up to 40 degrees. The contractor, when determining the cost of work on sites with such slopes, in local estimates applies an amendment from MDS 81-28.2001, Appendix No. 2, clause 9 "Construction of objects on mountain slopes with sharply rugged terrain, in cramped conditions with the preservation of the natural landscape." Whether the application of this amendment is justified, given that this document invalidated due to the entry into force of MDS 81-35.2004? Is it possible to apply an amendment from the Methodology for the Application of Estimated Norms, approved by Order No. 1028/pr. dated December 29, 2016, Appendix No. 3, paragraph 9 “Work is carried out on mountain slopes while preserving the natural landscape”? What conditions must be met for this amendment to be applied in local estimates?Collections GESN-2001 (FER, TER) are developed taking into account the performance of work in conditions that ensure uninterrupted work with maximum productivity of people and equipment. The need to use coefficients in local estimates that take into account the complicating conditions for the production of individual complexes of construction, installation, repair, construction and commissioning works is established by the construction organization project (POS), developed in accordance with the Regulations on the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their content, approved by the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation).
In accordance with the specified Regulations, the construction organization project for facilities industrial purpose should contain: a description of the features of the work in the conditions of an operating enterprise, at the locations underground utilities, power lines and communication; substantiation of the size and equipment of sites for storing materials, structures, equipment, enlarged modules and stands for their assembly. Solutions for the movement of heavy oversized equipment, enlarged modules and building structures.
At the same time, the cramped conditions for the storage of material and technical resources are reflected in the POS, taking into account the technological sequence of work performed within the time limits established calendar plans and construction (overhaul) schedules.
In this regard, if the PIC during the construction of facilities confirms the presence of one or more of the listed factors, it is allowed to apply the coefficient given in Appendix No. 2 to the Guidelines for the application of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, equipment installation and commissioning, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated February 9, 2017 No. 81 / pr. -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: During the construction of the facility, for the needs of the construction site, work was carried out on the installation of a foundation for a stationary tower crane (according to the POS on the basis of a separate project developed by the general contractor). When making mutual settlements with the Customer, he refuses to pay for these works, referring to clause 22 of the GOS 81-05-01-2001 and claims that everything is taken into account in this clause of the GOS, while the VZIS is paid to the general contractor by calculating the coefficient at the end of the KS form -2. Please clarify whether the costs of constructing a foundation for a stationary tower crane are taken into account in GSN 81-05-01-2001, if not, then what normative document can confirm this.In accordance with clause 22 of Appendix 2 of the List of Works and Costs Related to Title Temporary Buildings and Structures of the GSN-2001 Collection of Estimated Cost Rates for the Construction of Temporary Buildings and Structures (hereinafter - GSN 81-05-01-2001), the cost of the device bases for machines and mechanisms are taken into account by the estimated norms of title temporary buildings and structures, except for the installation of crane runways for cranes with a foundation for them.
Constructed title temporary buildings and structures in accordance with clause 3.1.8 of the Accounting Regulations long term investment, approved by the letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated December 30, 1993 No. 160 and clause 3.4 of GSN 81-05-01-2001, are accepted for operation with the preparation by the contractor of all required documents, including estimates for constructed temporary buildings and structures, are credited to the customer's fixed assets (except for temporary roads, access roads and architecturally designed fences) and transferred to the use of the contractor in the manner prescribed in the contract. -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: In the technical part of the HESN Collection 13. "Protection of building structures and equipment from corrosion" in Appendix 13.3 "Coefficients to the estimated standards, taking into account the conditions for the use of HESN Collection 13", the coefficient is indicated in paragraph 3.13. "Painting and priming of lattice surfaces". I ask you to give a definition of what refers to the lattice surface.When determining the cost of works on anti-corrosion protection steel structures the assignment of metal structures, depending on the geometric scheme, to lattice (through structures made of intersecting rods) or solid structures is performed on the basis design solutions.
When compiling the estimate documentation, the choice (justification) of one or another estimate standard from the current estimate standards is carried out in accordance with the design decisions made and the work production technology used in the project and falls within the competence of the construction customer and the organization developing project documentation.
In accordance with clause 2.13.3. " General provisions. Estimates of the scope of work "GESN 81-02-13-2017 Collection 13. "Protection of building structures and equipment from corrosion" the area of painting steel structures is determined according to Appendix 13.1 of Collection 13, which shows the ratios of weight and area for various profiles of rolled steel.
Given in clause 3.13 of Appendix 13.2 "Coefficients to the estimated standards, taking into account the conditions for the use of the GESN Collection 13", are used when painting and priming lattice surfaces to the standards of tables 13-03-001 to 13-03-004. -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: Please clarify the legitimacy of using the coefficient 1.68 in the estimates for commissioning at special-purpose facilities (work is carried out underground at a level below 3 m).In accordance with paragraph 30 of the Regulation on the composition of sections of project documentation and the requirements for their content, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation), estimate documentation for the construction of facilities capital construction financed in whole or in part with the attraction of funds federal budget, is compiled using the estimated standards included in the federal register of estimated standards. The use of multiplying factors in the development of estimate documentation for commissioning should be justified in the construction organization project (COS), developed in accordance with the Regulations. When determining the estimated cost of commissioning work in underground conditions (in mines, mines, subways and other underground structures, including special purposes), the coefficients given in Appendix 1 of the Methodology for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian Federation (MDS 81-35.2004, table 4, clauses 8.1 - 8.4) and in Appendix No. 2 to the Guidelines for the application of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, installation of equipment and commissioning, approved by order Ministry of Construction of Russia dated February 9, 2017 No. 81 / pr. At the same time, the coefficients given in paragraphs 8.1÷8.4 of Table 4 of Appendix 1 to MDS 81-35.2004 do not apply to the labor costs of workers and the operating time of machines and mechanisms. The provisions of MDS 81-35.2004 are valid to the extent that they do not contradict the standards approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated February 9, 2017 No. 81 / pr.
-
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: In accordance with paragraph 6 of Table 3 of MDS 81.35-2004, the design organization in the estimates for the reconstruction of the facility accepts a coefficient for cramped conditions of 1.5 (repair of existing buildings, including residential buildings, without resettlement). These constrained conditions are taken into account in the POS and agreed in the act with the customer.
The customer, when considering the estimate documentation, excludes the coefficient of 1.5 from the calculations, citing the fact that the object refers to the reconstruction, and not to the repair of the building.
Please explain the procedure for applying in the estimated calculations the coefficient for the repair of existing buildings (including residential buildings) without resettlement at the reconstructed facilities.Collections GESN-2001 (FER, TER) are developed taking into account the performance of work in conditions that ensure uninterrupted work with maximum productivity of people and equipment. The need to use coefficients in local estimates that take into account the complicating conditions for the production of individual complexes of construction, installation and repair and construction works is established by the project for the organization of construction (repair) (PIC), developed in accordance with the Regulation on the composition of sections of project documentation and the requirements for their content, approved Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 87 dated February 16, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation).
In accordance with the specified Regulations, the project for the organization of construction (repair) must contain, for non-industrial facilities, a description of the features of carrying out work in conditions of cramped urban development, at the locations of underground utilities, power transmission and communication lines, a list of measures and design solutions to determine technical means and methods of work that ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements for labor protection and environmental protection measures during the construction (repair) period. For a more accurate reflection in the estimate documentation of the conditions for the production of work, a list of external and internal work performed in cramped conditions should be given in the POS. If the POS provides for the performance of work in cramped conditions, the labor costs and remuneration of workers, the cost of operating machines, including the remuneration of machinists, it is allowed to apply the coefficients given in Appendix No. 2 to the Guidelines for the application of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, installation of equipment and commissioning, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated February 9, 2017 No. 81 / pr.
When determining the estimated cost of construction (reconstruction, overhaul) of a capital construction facility, the application of coefficients for the conditions of work is carried out based on the name of the title of the capital construction facility specified in the design and estimate documentation, and is within the competence of the construction customer and the organization developing project documentation.
For buildings (objects) of capital construction, the coefficient for the conditions for the production of work, determined by the title of the main purpose object, is applied to the objects and types of work included in the summary estimate of the cost of construction (reconstruction, overhaul) of this building (object). -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: Does the contractor legally require the use of constraint coefficients:
1) MDS35 pr.1 v.1 p.Z. Production of construction and other works in existing buildings and structures in cramped conditions 1.15;
2) MDS35 pr.1 v.2 p.1 Production installation work in existing buildings and structures freed from equipment and other items that interfere with the normal production of work 1.2. in the performance of works on decorative repair of staircases apartment buildings. Residential buildings 9-storey with lift, 5-storey without lift.Collections GESN-2001 (FER, TER) are developed taking into account the performance of work in conditions that ensure uninterrupted work with maximum productivity of people and equipment.
In accordance with the specified Regulations, the construction organization project for industrial and non-industrial facilities must contain a description of the features of the work in the conditions of an operating enterprise in cramped conditions.
If the POS during the construction (overhaul) of facilities provides for the performance of work in difficult production conditions, as a result of which the productivity of workers and construction equipment decreases, it is allowed to apply coefficients to labor costs and remuneration of workers and the cost of operating machines, including the application of coefficients to the remuneration of machinists ( taking into account the coefficients to the prices from the technical parts of the collections) given in tables 1 and 3 of Appendix No. 2 to the Guidelines for the use of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, installation of equipment and commissioning, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated 09.02 .2017 No. 81/pr (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines).
When developing estimate documentation for the corresponding type of work, the need to apply multiplying factors is reflected in the construction organization project and falls within the competence of the organization that develops the design documentation and the construction customer. -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: A building is under construction in the city. In accordance with the developed construction organization project (COS), the cramped conditions of construction in the built-up part of the city are characterized by three factors:- during the construction of the building, tower cranes are used, it is envisaged to limit the rotation of the boom outside the fence of the construction site;
- an extensive network of engineering communications (removal for a while from the spot of building a heat network, power supply networks);
- existing buildings in operation fall into the work area.
Considering the specifics of the factors characterizing cramped conditions (specified in paragraph 2 of the notes of Appendix No. 1 of MDS 81-35-2004) in the built-up part of cities, as well as the fact that the presence of the above factors is impossible (unlikely) inside the building, is it correct to believe that this coefficient should be applied (if necessary) to outdoor works, such as, for example, laying of external engineering networks, production earthworks, arrangement (asphalting) of roads, work carried out during the construction of buildings and structures, landscaping work, etc. ?Collections GESN-2001 (FER, TER) are developed taking into account the performance of work in conditions that ensure uninterrupted work with maximum productivity of people and equipment.
The need to use coefficients in local estimates that take into account the complicating conditions for the production of individual complexes of construction, installation and repair and construction works is established by the construction organization project (POS), developed in accordance with the Regulations on the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their content, approved by a decree of the Government of the Russian Federation Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation).
Taking into account that the choice of decisions on the organization of construction in accordance with the Code of Rules for the Organization of Construction (SP 48.13330.2011) is carried out on the basis of a variant study using criteria-based assessment methods, in order to more accurately reflect the conditions for the production of work in the estimate documentation, the POS should contain a list and scope of work performed in cramped conditions.
At the same time, the cramped conditions for storing material and technical resources are reflected in the construction organization project, taking into account the technological sequence of construction and installation works within the time limits established by the calendar plans and construction schedules.
If during the construction of POS facilities the performance of work in cramped conditions is confirmed, it is allowed to use the coefficients given in Table 1 of Appendix No. 2 to the Methodological Recommendations for the Application of Federal Unit Prices for Construction, Special Construction, Repair and Construction, Installation of Equipment and Commissioning, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated 09.02.2017 No. 81/pr.
According to note 1.1 to this table, the coefficients specified in paragraphs 2 and 5 do not apply to work performed on the premises of capital construction projects.
In connection with the foregoing, when developing estimate documentation for the corresponding type of work, the need to use multiplying factors is reflected in the construction organization project and falls within the competence of the organization developing the design documentation and the construction customer. -
Coefficients taking into account the conditions of work
Question: Clarification of the cases of applying the coefficients 1.15 and 1.25, provided for in clause 4.7 of MDS 81-35.2004 and clause 8.7.1 " methodological recommendations on the application of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, installation of equipment and commissioning works ”, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia dated 09.02.2017 No. 81 / pr, simultaneously with the coefficients for tightness in the estimate documentation.According to the provisions of the Methodology for determining the cost of construction products on the territory of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - MDS 81-35.2004), estimated norms and prices provide for the performance of work in normal (standard) conditions, not complicated by external factors.
In accordance with paragraph 5.2. Methodological recommendations on the application of federal unit prices for construction, special construction, repair and construction, equipment installation and commissioning, approved by order of the Ministry of Construction of Russia No. 81 / pr on February 9, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Methodological Recommendations), estimated standards and unit prices developed on their basis the optimal technological and organizational schemes for the production of works, a set (list) of machines, mechanisms and material resources are taken into account with the rational organization of labor and production, modern development equipment and technology, compliance with safety requirements.
Collections GESN-2001 (FER, TER) are developed taking into account the performance of work in conditions that ensure uninterrupted work with maximum productivity of people and equipment.
The need to use coefficients in local estimates that take into account the complicating conditions for the production of individual complexes of construction, installation and repair and construction works is established by the construction organization project (hereinafter referred to as POS), developed in accordance with the Regulations on the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their content, approved by the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation).
If the POS provides for the performance of work in difficult production (cramped) conditions, as a result of which the labor productivity of workers and construction equipment decreases, the coefficients given in Appendix No. 1 to MDS 81-35.2004 (taking into account the coefficients for prices from the technical part of the collections) and Appendix No. 2 to the Methodological Recommendations.
The size of these coefficients is determined depending on the collections of elemental estimated norms (prices) used in determining the estimated cost.
A coefficient of 1.2 to the unit prices for construction and special construction works (except for the unit prices of collection 46), as well as for the installation of equipment, takes into account the conditions for the production of repair and construction work in the premises of the operated capital construction facility without stopping the working process of the enterprise, while in the production area there is no existing technological or laboratory equipment, furniture and other cluttering items, as well as in existing buildings without resettlement or in cases where the building as a whole is not resettled and work is being carried out on premises vacated for repair, while in places of common residence (corridors, stairs, etc.) there is an intersection of human flows of construction workers and operational personnel.
Based on clause 8.7.3 of the Guidelines, the coefficients of 1.15 to labor costs and wages of workers and 1.25 to the costs of operating construction machines and mechanisms, including the labor costs of machinists, take into account the inability to apply technological schemes for the production of work adopted in the estimated the norms included in the collections of GESN, on the basis of which unit prices have been developed; losses contractors associated with the low volume of work, reducing the annual operation of construction machines.
The specified coefficients in determining the estimated cost on the basis of clause 8.7.4 of the Methodological Recommendations can be applied simultaneously with coefficients that take into account complicating factors and conditions for the production of work.
